4.7 Article

Cisplatin and resveratrol induce apoptosis and autophagy following oxidative stress in malignant mesothelioma cells

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 96-107

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2016.08.033

关键词

Cisplatin; Resveratrol; Malignant mesothelioma; Apoptosis; Autophagy; Chemoresistance

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2015R1D1A3A03020269]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is characterized by poor responsiveness to current chemotherapeutic drugs, usually owing to high resistance to apoptosis. Here, we investigated chemosensitizing effects of phytochemical resveratrol, in combination with cisplatin, on MM cells. The combination treatment of cisplatin and resveratrol (CDDP/RSV) synergistically induced apoptosis, as evidenced by typical cell morphological changes, the appearance of sub-G0/G1 peak, an increase in the Annexin V(+) cells and the cleavage of caspase-3 and PARP. CDDP/RSV increased ROS production and depolarization of mitochondria' membrane potential with an increase in the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio. These changes were attenuated by pretreatment with N-acetylcysteine, suggesting that CDDP/RSV induced apoptosis through oxidative mitochondrial damage. Compared with MSTO-211H cells, CDDP/RSV was less efficient in killing H2452 cells. H-2452 cells exhibited an enhanced autophagy to CDDP/RSV, as observed by an increase in viable cells exhibiting intense LysoTracker Red staining and up-regulation of Beclin-1 and LC3A. Inhibition of autophagy by bafilomycin Al rendered cells more sensitive to CDDP/RSV-induced cytotoxicity and this was associated with induction of apoptosis. These data indicate that the increased resistance of H-2452 cells to CDDP/RSV is closely related to the activation of self-defensive autophagy, and provide the rationale for targeting the autophagy regulation in the treatment of MM. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据