4.3 Article

Utility of three-dimensional modeling of the fetal airway for ex utero intrapartum treatment

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 595-598

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-021-02950-8

关键词

Difficult airway; Fetus; EXIT procedure; Three-dimensional model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advancements in 3D printing technology have introduced new opportunities in clinical medicine, particularly for planning complex surgeries and prenatal treatment. This study demonstrates the first use of 3D printing technology to create a fetal airway model for planning an ex utero intrapartum treatment procedure.
Recent technological developments in three-dimensional (3D) printing have created new opportunities for applications in clinical medicine. 3D printing has been adopted for teaching and planning complicated surgeries, including maxillofacial, orthopedic reconstructions, and airway manipulation for one-lung ventilation or airway stenting. We present here the first use of such technology to print a model from in utero imaging for intrapartum treatment planning. A 32-week fetus presented with congenital high airway obstruction syndrome (CHAOS) due to a large cervical lymphatic malformation. An ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure was planned to allow delivery of a viable infant. We printed a 3D model of the fetal airway by printing separate elements: mandible, tongue, mass, larynx, and trachea from the fetal MRI. The elements were stuck together maintaining correct anatomical relationships. Airway planning was then performed in consultation with a pediatric ear nose and throat (ENT) surgeon. 3D modeling in utero presents many challenges: the resolution of the 3D model generated from a fetal MRI is less crisp than from CT images, fetal position may be variable and not in a defined anatomical plane, movement artifact occurs. Nevertheless, pre-procedure simulations with the aid of 3D modeling promoted team cooperation and well-prepared management of the fetus during EXIT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据