4.5 Article

APOE E2/E2 Is Associated with Slower Rate of Cognitive Decline with Age

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 83, 期 2, 页码 853-860

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-201205

关键词

Apolipoproteins E; cognitive aging; cognitive dysfunction; genetics

资金

  1. NIH [T32 GM74905, K01 AG057798, R01 AG061844, U19 AG063893]
  2. Boston University Digital Health Initiative Research Incubation Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that individuals carrying the APOE E2 allele had a slower rate of cognitive decline, indicating a protective effect against cognitive impairment.
Background: The E4 allele of the APOE gene is known to be associated with cognitive impairment. However, a limited number of studies have examined the association between the E2 allele and longitudinal changes of cognitive function. Objective: To determine whether rates of cognitive change differ in carriers of the APOE E2 allele compared to other genotypes. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from two ongoing longitudinal cohort studies, the Long Life Family Study (LLFS) and New England Centenarian Study (NECS). We included participants who had APOE genotyping data, data from longitudinal administrations of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS), and age, sex, and education available. We assessed whether cognitive change as measured by rate of decline in TICS score differed among people with different APOE genotypes. We used a hierarchical mixed effect model with APOE genotypes, their interactions with age, and potential confounders. Results: After adjusting for sex and education, in carriers of the common E3/E3 genotype, TICS score decreased by 0.15 points per year of age. In those with the E2/E2 genotype, TICS score decreased by 0.05 points per year of age, a significantly slower rate of decline (p = 0.017). We observed no protective effect of the E2/E3 genotype on cognitive decline. Conclusion: These results suggest a protective effect of the E2/E2 genotype on a measure of global cognitive function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据