4.5 Article

Relevance of Complaint Severity in Predicting the Progression of Subjective Cognitive Decline and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Machine Learning Approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 82, 期 3, 页码 1229-1242

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-210334

关键词

Cognitive dysfunction; dementia; diagnosis; follow-up studies

资金

  1. ERDF founds by the National Research Agency (Spanish 'Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities) [PSI2014-55316-C3-1-R, PSI2017-89389-C2-1-R]
  2. Galician Government (Conselleria de Cultura, Educacion e Ordenacion Universitaria)
  3. Galician Government (axudas para a consolidacion e estruturacion de unidades de investigacion competitivas do Sistema Universitario de Galicia) [ED431-2017/27]
  4. Galician Dementia Research Network (GAIN, Xunta de Galicia) [IN607C-2017/02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that differentiation based on severity of subjective cognitive complaints (SCCs) in subjective cognitive decline (SCD) can effectively predict cognitive decline progression. Factors such as memory, cognitive reserve, general health, and diagnostic stability play a significant role in the predictive algorithm.
Background: The presence of subjective cognitive complaints (SCCs) is a core criterion for diagnosis of subjective cognitive decline (SCD); however, no standard procedure for distinguishing normative and non-normative SCCs has yet been established. Objective: To determine whether differentiation of participants with SCD according to SCC severity improves the validity of the prediction of progression in SCD and MCI and to explore validity metrics for two extreme thresholds of the distribution in scores in a questionnaire on SCCs. Methods: Two hundred and fifty-three older adults with SCCs participating in the Compostela Aging Study (CompAS) were classified as MCI or SCD at baseline. The participants underwent two follow-up assessments and were classified as cognitively stable or worsened. Severity of SCCs (low and high) in SCD was established by using two different percentiles of the questionnaire score distribution as cut-off points. The validity of these cut-off points for predicting progression using socio-demographic, health, and neuropsychological variables was tested by machine learning (ML) analysis. Results: Severity of SCCs in SCD established considering the 5th percentile as a cut-off point proved to be the best metric for predicting progression. The variables with the main role in conforming the predictive algorithm were those related to memory, cognitive reserve, general health, and the stability of diagnosis over time. Conclusion: Moderate to high complainers showed an increased probability of progression in cognitive decline, suggesting the clinical relevance of standard procedures to determine SCC severity. Our findings highlight the important role of the multimodal ML approach in predicting progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据