4.7 Article

Constructing Bi4Ti3O12/CdS heterostructure by Atomic Layer Deposition for increased photocatalytic performance through suppressed electron/hole recombination

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 866, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.158978

关键词

Heterostructured nanomaterials; Atomic Layer Deposition; CdS nanoparticles; Bi4Ti3O12 nanorods; Photocatalytic degradation

资金

  1. Shaanxi Provincial Education Department [20JK0959, 20JK0968]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2017JM2028]
  3. Special Fund for Talent Research of Xijing University [XJ20B020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Utilizing Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) to deposit CdS nanoparticles on Bi4Ti3O12 nanorods, the synthesis of Bi4Ti3O12/CdS composites demonstrated significantly improved photocatalytic performance, showcasing efficient electron/hole separation and synergic effect between Bi4Ti3O12 and CdS for high-performance photocatalysts.
Heterostructured nanomaterials are promising candidates for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. Herein, Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) approach was applied to synthesize Bi4Ti3O12/CdS composites by depositing CdS nanoparticles on Bi4Ti3O12 nanorods. Ultrafine CdS nanoparticles (about 2.1 nm) were uniformly deposited on each Bi4Ti3O12 nanorod, forming Bi4Ti3O12/CdS heterostructure, which displayed remarkably improved photocatalytic performance. With visible light irradiation, the composite with 40 ALD deposition cycles provided the photodegradation efficiency of 98% for RhB in 1 h. Further analysis indicated that the sample showed an efficient electron/hole separation rate. This excellent photocatalytic performance was supported by the synergic effect between the Bi4Ti3O12 and CdS. We believe the design and synthesis of such a heterostructured catalyst offers a new approach to obtain high-performance photocatalysts for various photocatalytic applications. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据