4.7 Article

Yttrium oxide nanorods as electrocatalytic polysulfides traps for curbing shuttle effect in lithium-sulfur batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 891, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162074

关键词

Li-S batteries; Shuttle effect; Electrocatalyst; Yttrium oxide nanorods

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51874146]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018T110551, 2017M621640]
  3. Six Talent Peaks Project of Jiangsu Province [XCL-125]
  4. Start-up Foundation of Jiangsu University for Senior Talents [15JDG014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The novel electrode material modified by Y2O3 nanorods shows promising performance in Li-S batteries, indicating good application potential in industrialization.
Although lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries have high theoretical specific capacity, their development is limited by low reaction kinetics during solid-liquid conversion of polysulfides and severe dissolution of polysulfides leading in loss of active materials and the corrosion of Li metal. In this paper, a novel electrode material which synthesized by yttrium oxide (Y2O3) nanorods modified Ketjen black@sulfur (Y2O3/KB@S) composites is introduced and evaluated in Li-S batteries. Y2O3 nanorods have good adsorption-catalytic synergistic effect on polysulfides, which can curb the shuttle effect and enhance the redox kinetics of polysulfides. The initial specific discharge capacity of Y2O3/KB@S electrode shows 828 mAh g(-1) at 0.5 C current density, and the capacity maintains at 388 mAh g(-1) after 500 cycles with the areal sulfur loading of 3.1 mg cm(-2). Furthermore, Y2O3/KB@S cathode delivered 5.09 mAh g(-1) discharge capacity and retained 4.21 mAh g(-1) after 100 cycles at 0.2 C current density when the areal sulfur loading increasing to 5.0 mg cm(-2). Therefore, Y2O3 nanorods modified Li-S battery cathode material has good application potential in its industrialization process. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据