4.7 Article

Short-term toxicity studies of loline alkaloids in mice

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 243-249

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2016.06.002

关键词

Lolines; Toxicology; Sub-chronic feeding study; Endophyte; Epichloe

资金

  1. New Zealand Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment [C10X0807, C10X1403]
  2. Grasslanz Technology Ltd
  3. New Zealand Foundation for Arable Research
  4. Australian Grains Research and Development Corporation
  5. New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) [C10X1403, C10X0807] Funding Source: New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epichloe endophytes have been used successfully in pastoral systems to reduce the impact of insect pests through the expression of secondary metabolites. The use of endophytes could be extended to other plant species, such as cereal crops, where the production of bioactive secondary metabolites would reduce the reliance on pesticides for insect control. The success of this approach is dependent on the selection of an appropriate secondary metabolite target which must not only be effective against insect pests but also be safe for grazing and monogastric animals. The loline alkaloids have been identified as possible target metabolites as they are associated with potent effects on insects and low toxicity to grazing animals. The purpose of the current study was to generate toxicological data on the loline alkaloids in a monogastric system using mice. Male and female mice were fed 415 mg/kg/day total lolines for a 3-week period. The loline treatment caused no statistically significant effect on gross pathology, histology, haematology, blood chemistry, heart rate, blood pressure or motor coordination. Reduced weight gain and food consumption were noted in the loline groups during the initial stages of the experiment. This experiment raises no food safety concerns for the loline alkaloids. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据