4.7 Article

Enhanced critical current density at high magnetic fields in MgB2 wire processed by in-situ spark plasma sintering

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 891, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162007

关键词

MgB2 superconductor wire; spark plasma sintering; rapid treatment; in-situ reaction; preferential growth

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFE0301401]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China [2020J01198]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sparking plasma sintering (SPS) technique can effectively improve the grain connection and refinement of MgB2, enhancing its superconductivity performance.
Sparking plasma sintering (SPS) technique has the characteristics of rapid heating and cooling rate, high mass density, and grain activation sintering. Therefore, it may be used to improve the grain connection, refine the grains, and enhance the superconducting current-carrying capacity of MgB2. In this paper, the MgB2 wire prepared by the in-situ method is rapidly treated by the SPS method, and the effects of different SPS sintering conditions on the phase formation, microstructure characteristics and superconductivity of the MgB2 material are studied, and compared with the MgB2 prepared by conventional sintering and the ex-situ SPS method. It was found that the SPS-treated samples were in a rapidly changing non-equilibrium state during the entire sintering process, so there are existing both flake particles and nanoparticles in the samples, which significantly improves the connection of the grains and refine the grains, resulting in significantly improved superconducting performance for MgB2. The critical current densityJ(c) of SPS-treated sample at 850 celcius reached 1354 A/cm(2) @ (10 K, 5 T) and 1615 A/cm(2) @ (20 K, 3 T), which were 3.7 times and 2.6 times that of conventional sintering sample. Our research shows that SPS is an effective method to improve the superconductivity of in-situ MgB2 wire. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据