4.7 Article

Cornflower Honey as a Model for Authentication of Unifloral Honey Using Classical Methods Combined with Plant-Based Marker Substances Such as Lumichrome

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 69, 期 38, 页码 11406-11416

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c03621

关键词

cornflower honey; lumichrome; fluorescence; TLC; HPLC-PDA; HPLC-FLD; UHPLC-MS/MS; HS-SPME-GC/MS

资金

  1. European Union [EU] [1308/2013]
  2. Ministries of Agriculture of Brandenburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Saxony
  3. Senate of Berlin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identification of single-flower honey relies on the method of melissopalynology, which uses pollen carried by forager bees in floral nectar for authentication. Lumichrome is a suitable marker substance for cornflower honey, along with other nonvolatile and volatile compounds for specific differentiation.
According to legislation, unifloral honeys are characterized by their organoleptic, physicochemical, and microscopic properties. Melissopalynology is the established method for identifying the pollen taken up with the floral nectar by forager bees and is used for authentication of the nectar sources in honey. For cornflower honey (Centaurea cyanus), the pollen input does not correlate with the nectar input, because the nectar is produced both in floral and in extrafloral nectaries. The well-known cornflower marker lumichrome has now also been detected in the extrafloral nectar. Therefore, lumichrome is a suitable marker substance for cornflower honey. Four different methods for the sole analysis of lumichrome in honey were validated and compared. Studies over nine years have shown that unifloral cornflower honey should contain approximately 35 mg/kg lumichrome. For a further differentiated cornflower honey specific verification, other nonvolatile compounds like 7-carboxylumichrome and volatiles, such as 3,4-dihydro-3-oxoedulan I and 3,4-dihydro-3-oxoedulan II, should be analyzed. This enables a more specific accuracy for the classification of unifloral cornflower honey.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据