4.7 Review

Cross-Talk between Hydrogen Peroxide and Nitric Oxide during Plant Development and Responses to Stress

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 69, 期 33, 页码 9485-9497

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01605

关键词

nitric oxide; hydrogen peroxide; cross-talk; stomatal movement; programmed cell death

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22006130, 31872167]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LQ21C150007]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2020QNA6013]
  4. Scientific Research Fund of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department [Y202045563]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) play critical roles as regulators in plants, interacting synergistically or antagonistically in various biological processes. Their interplay involves processes like hypersensitive response, stomatal movement, and plant responses to adverse conditions.
Nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) are gradually becoming established as critical regulators in plants under physiological and stressful conditions. Strong spatiotemporal correlations in their production and distribution have been identified in various plant biological processes. In this context, NO and H2O2 act synergistically or antagonistically as signals or stress promoters depending on their respective concentrations, engaging in processes such as the hypersensitive response, stomatal movement, and abiotic stress responses. Moreover, proteins identified as potential targets of NO-based modifications include a number of enzymes related to H2O2 metabolism, reinforcing their cross-talk. In this review, several processes of well-characterized functional interplay between H2O2 and NO are discussed with respect to the most recent reported evidence on hypersensitive response-induced programmed cell death, stomatal movement, and plant responses to adverse conditions and, where known, the molecular mechanisms and factors underpinning their cross-talk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据