4.7 Article

Lycopene Accumulation in Cara Cara Red-flesh Navel Orange Is Correlated with Weak Abscisic Acid Catabolism

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 69, 期 29, 页码 8236-8246

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c03766

关键词

red-flesh oranges; carotenoids; limonoid aglycones; endogenous phytohormones; ABA catabolites; volatiles

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2018YFD1000200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32072530]
  3. Key SAMP
  4. T Special Projects of Shaanxi Province, China [2020zdzx0305-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research found that compared to wild types, red-flesh citrus mutants have increased levels of lycopene, carotenoids, and limonoid aglycones, but decreased levels of abscisic acid catabolites, monoterpenoid volatiles, and sesquiterpenoid volatiles. The red flesh is related to weak ABA catabolism, especially ABAGE, and decreased transcript levels of genes encoding enzymes for ABAGE biosynthesis.
Lycopene is the main pigment in red-flesh citrus fruits, and its formation is a research hotspot. To explore the basis of lycopene accumulation in red-flesh mutants, we profiled the terpenoid metabolites. Compared with their respective wild types, Cara Cara (Cara) [and Red-Anliu (R-An)] oranges showed increased carotenoid and limonoid aglycone contents and decreased contents of abscisic acid (ABA) catabolites, monoterpenoid volatiles, and sesquiterpenoid volatiles. Cara contained less than half of the amount of ABA glucose ester (ABAGE), the main ABA derivative in oranges. Parallel lower transcript levels of NCED and ABA glucosyltransferase in Cara were detected at the mature green stage. These results document the changes in terpenoid profiles in Cara and show that the red flesh of citrus color mutants is related to weak ABA catabolism, especially ABAGE, and decreased transcript levels of two genes encoding uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glycosyltransferases that catalyze ABAGE biosynthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据