4.7 Article

Evaluation of Cellular Absorption and Metabolism of β-Carotene Loaded in Nanocarriers after In Vitro Digestion

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 69, 期 32, 页码 9383-9394

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c02431

关键词

digested nanocarriers; cellular absorption; metabolism; beta-carotene; retinoid; Caco-2

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32072153]
  2. 111 project [B07029]
  3. national first-class discipline program of Food Science and Technology [JUFSTR20180204]
  4. program of Collaborative Innovation Center of Food Safety and Quality Control in Jiangsu Province, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that protein emulsifiers encapsulating BC can affect its uptake and metabolism in cells through different carrier designs. The addition of lipids can enhance the absorption rate of BC in NEs and NPs, while protein-based carriers can reduce the rate of BC metabolism into retinyl palmitate.
Three protein emulsifiers encapsulating beta-carotene (BC) with accompanying lipids into nanoemulsions (NEs) or without lipids into nanoparticles (NPs) were fabricated to study the effect of the type of interfacial protein on carrier design and the structure remodeling during digestion on the overall uptake and metabolism of BC in Caco-2 cells. BC-loaded micelles and micellar-like aggregates were collected after in vitro digestion and applied to Caco-2 cell monolayers. The digestion process significantly enhanced the cellular uptake of BC by 1.2-2.2 times and 4.1 8.2 times loaded in NEs and NPs, respectively. Whey protein isolate-based carriers improved the absorption but decreased the metabolism of BC to retinyl palmitate. The presence of lipids was found to improve metabolism and aid the transport of retinoids to the basolateral side of Caco-2 monolayers. Understanding the transportation behavior of the protein-based nanocarries after digestion may contribute to the design of biosafe carriers with higher bioavailability to deliver lipophilic nutrients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据