4.6 Article

Exploring adult critical illness survivors' experiences of fatigue: A qualitative study

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
卷 77, 期 12, 页码 4836-4846

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jan.14995

关键词

critical illness; fatigue; nursing; qualitative research; rehabilitation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This qualitative study explores adult experiences of fatigue after discharge from an intensive care unit and identifies potential management strategies. Three themes were identified: fatigue varies among individuals; complex interrelating interactions; and personalized fatigue strategies. The study highlights the significant impact fatigue has on survivors and their families, and the varied success of interventions such as exercise and support from others.
Aims To explore adult experiences of fatigue after discharge from an intensive care unit and identify potential management strategies. Design An exploratory qualitative study. Methods One to one audio-recorded semi-structured interviews with 17 adult survivors of critical illness in the United Kingdom, lasting up to 1 h, between September 2019 and January 2020. Anonymised and verbatim-transcribed interview data underwent a standard process of inductive thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clarke. Findings Three themes were identified: fatigue is different for everyone; complex interrelating interactions; and personalised fatigue strategies. Fatigue was described as a distressing symptom, unique to the individual that causes an array of complex, often long-term interrelating impacts on the survivor and their wider family, made worse by a lack of understanding, empathy and support resources. Support from others, alongside interventions such as exercise, good nutrition, information and alternative therapies are used by survivors with variable degrees of success. Conclusions This qualitative study reports peoples' experiences of fatigue after critical illness. Findings highlight the significant impact it has on people's lives and those of their family and friends.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据