4.4 Article

Electrochemical and surface analytical studies of transition metal bipyridine dicarboxylic acid complexes as corrosion inhibitors for a mild steel in HCl solution

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 567-583

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2021.1929017

关键词

Corrosion inhibitor; transition metal complex; adsorption; acid corrosion

资金

  1. Educational Department of Liaoning Province [LJ2020013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transition metal complexes Ni(bpda)(2), Zn(bpda)(2), and Mn(bpda)(2) demonstrated superior corrosion inhibition performance compared to the bpda ligand, with Ni(bpda)(2) showing the most effective inhibition. Observations of corrosion morphology further confirmed the excellent performance of these complexes, while Fourier transform infrared and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses confirmed the adsorption mechanism of the corrosion inhibitors.
The 2,2 '-bipyridine-3,3 '-dicarboxylic acid (bpda) and its transition metal complexes including Ni(bpda)(2), Zn(bpda)(2) and Mn(bpda)(2), were synthesized and tested as corrosion inhibitors for a carbon steel in 0.5 M HCl solution by electrochemical tests and surface analyses. The electrochemical results indicate that the inhibition efficiencies increase with the concentration of corrosion inhibitors. The complexes exhibit higher inhibition efficiencies compared to the bpda ligand, among which Ni(bpda)(2) is the most effective for inhibiting corrosion. The corrosion morphology observation further evidences the superior corrosion inhibition performance of the three complexes. Fourier transform infrared and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses confirm the spontaneous adsorption of all four inhibitors on the steel surface, and the adsorption analysis suggests a combined physisorption and chemisorption mechanism. Accordingly, the superior corrosion inhibition performance of the three complexes could be attributed to their good adsorption abilities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据