4.5 Article

Microwaves as a pretreatment for enhancing enzymatic hydrolysis of pineapple industrial waste for bioethanol production

期刊

FOOD AND BIOPRODUCTS PROCESSING
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 203-213

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2016.07.001

关键词

Lignocellulose pretreatments; Microwaves; Pineapple industrial waste; Saccharification; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Bioethanol

资金

  1. Universitat Politecnica de Valencia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pineapple industry generates significant amounts of residues which are classified as lignocellulosic residual biomass. In the present paper, microwaves are studied as a pretreatment to improve pineapple waste saccharification. Different microwave (MW) powers (10.625, 8.5, 6.375, 4.25 and 2.125 W/g) and exposure times (1-20 min) were applied to the solid part of the waste before enzymatic hydrolysis. Infrared thermography was used to assess temperature evolution and structural modifications were evaluated by Cryo-SEM. Sugar content and fermentation inhibitors (phenols, furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural) were also determined. MW increased sugar yield as long as intermediate powers were used (up to 6.375 W/g). However, high powers and longer treatments resulted in sugar degradation and/or a decrease in the efficiency of the enzymatic hydrolysis process. Temperature records indicated that thermal sugar degradation may occur in those cases. The presence of fermentation inhibitors have been confirmed and related to prolonged MW treatments. Microscopic observations suggested that mild microwave pretreatments may promote microstructural changes that enhance enzyme performance, whereas harsher treatments could increase tissue compactness and reduce the effectiveness of the enzymatic treatment. It is concluded that microwave pretreatments using the appropriate energy supply and exposure time enhances saccharification efficiency, potentially improving further bioethanol yield. (C) 2016 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据