4.7 Article

Spray Drying Formulation of Polyphenols-Rich Grape Marc Extract: Evaluation of Operating Conditions and Different Natural Carriers

期刊

FOOD AND BIOPROCESS TECHNOLOGY
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 2046-2058

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11947-016-1792-0

关键词

Polyphenols; Spray drying; Grape marc; Maltodextrin; Whey protein; Pea protein

资金

  1. Marie Curie Industry-Academia Partnerships and Pathways [FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IAPP-612208]
  2. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad
  3. Universidad de Valladolid [JCI-2012-14992]
  4. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia/Ministerio da Educacao e Ciencia [UID/Multi/04462/2013]
  5. FEDER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficiency of maltodextrin, whey protein isolate, and pea protein isolate to formulate a polyphenol-enriched grape marc extract by spray drying has been compared. Different inlet (120-140 A degrees C ) and outlet (81-89 A degrees C ) temperatures have been evaluated, as well as the amount of carrier expressed as carrier/extract ratio (0.1:1-1:1). The particles obtained were characterized in terms of their chemical composition, morphology, cytotoxicity, and cellular antioxidant activity. Outlet temperature was observed to have a higher influence on the particles than inlet temperature. A 22 % loss in total phenolic content was observed when the extract was spray dried without any carrier material, whereas the addition of the lowest amount of carrier lowered this value (< 12 %). While all the carriers tested showed high phenolic retention results, whey and pea protein outperformed maltodextrin in terms of total phenolic and anthocyanin content; in particular, the particles obtained with the lowest carrier/extract ratio presented the highest phenolic and anthocyanin concentrations per gram of product while maintaining a high phenolic recovery (> 87 %). Whey protein showed an enhancement of the chemical and cellular antioxidant activity per unit mass of gallic acid equivalent when compared to the other carriers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据