4.6 Review

Antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

期刊

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
卷 14, 期 15, 页码 1688-1703

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.06.020

关键词

aspirin; DAPT; oral anticoagulation; TAVR; antithrombotic therapy

资金

  1. Bristol Myers Squibb
  2. Medtronic
  3. Daiichi-Sankyo
  4. Bayer
  5. Janssen
  6. AstraZeneca
  7. ZonMw
  8. Abbott
  9. Amgen
  10. Astra Zeneca
  11. Biotronik
  12. Boston Scientific
  13. Cardinal Health
  14. CardioValve
  15. CSL Behring
  16. Edwards Lifesciences
  17. Guerbet
  18. InfraRedx
  19. Johnson Johnson
  20. Medicure
  21. Novartis
  22. Polares
  23. OrPha Suisse
  24. Pfizer
  25. Regeneron
  26. Sanofi
  27. Sinomed
  28. Terumo
  29. V-Wave
  30. Abiomed
  31. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  32. MedAlliance
  33. Xeltis
  34. CeloNova
  35. Eisai
  36. Eli Lilly
  37. Gilead
  38. Matsutani Chemical Industry
  39. Merck
  40. Osprey Medical
  41. Renal Guard Solutions
  42. Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation
  43. VWave
  44. Biosensors
  45. Cell Prothera
  46. Europa
  47. Idorsia
  48. IRIS-Servier
  49. Merck Sharpe Dohme
  50. Quantum Genomics
  51. Sanofi Aventis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TAVR presents challenges in terms of antithrombotic therapy, especially for elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. Careful selection of anticoagulant therapy strategies is crucial, and the net benefit of combining antiplatelet and OAC therapy remains uncertain.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a treatment option for symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis who are candidates for a bioprosthesis across the entire spectrum of risk. However, TAVR carries a risk for thrombotic and bleeding events, underscoring the importance of defining the optimal adjuvant antithrombotic regimen. Antithrombotic considerations are convoluted by the fact that many patients undergoing TAVR are generally elderly and present with multiple comorbidities, including conditions that may require long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) (eg, atrial fibrillation) and antiplatelet therapy (eg, coronary artery disease). After TAVR among patients without baseline indications for OAC, recent data suggest dual-antiplatelet therapy to be associated with an increased risk for bleeding events, particularly early postprocedure, compared with single-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin. Concerns surrounding the potential for thrombotic complications have raised the hypothesis of adjunctive use of OAC for patients with no baseline indications for anticoagulation. Although effective in modulating thrombus formation at the valve level, the bleeding hazard has shown to be unacceptably high, and the net benefit of combining antiplatelet and OAC therapy is unproven. For patients with indications for the use of long-term OAC, such as those with atrial fibrillation, the adjunctive use of antiplatelet therapy increases bleeding. Whether direct oral anticoagulant agents achieve better outcomes than vitamin K antagonists remains under investigation. Overall, single-antiplatelet therapy and OAC appear to be reasonable strategies in patients without and with indications for concurrent anticoagulation. The aim of the present review is to appraise the current published research and recommendations surrounding the management of antithrombotic therapy after TAVR, with perspectives on evolving paradigms and ongoing trials. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2021;14:1688-703) (c) 2021 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据