4.6 Article

Nationally Representative Repeat Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes Report From the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

期刊

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
卷 14, 期 15, 页码 1717-1726

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.06.011

关键词

KEY WORDS repeat TAVR; surgical explant after TAVR; TAVR; TAVR explantation; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

资金

  1. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
  2. Abbott
  3. Edwards Lifesciences
  4. Daiichi-Sankyo
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim
  6. CSL Behring
  7. Ferring Pharmaceuticals
  8. Bayer
  9. Afimmune
  10. Amarin
  11. Amgen
  12. AstraZeneca
  13. Bristol Myers Squibb
  14. Chiesi
  15. Eisai
  16. Ethicon
  17. Forest Laboratories
  18. Fractyl
  19. Idorsia
  20. Ironwood
  21. Ischemix
  22. Lexicon
  23. Lilly
  24. Medtronic
  25. PhaseBio
  26. Pfizer
  27. PLx Pharma
  28. Regeneron
  29. Roche
  30. Sanofi
  31. Synaptic
  32. The Medicines Company
  33. Abbott Vascular
  34. Boston Scientific
  35. ViVitro Labs
  36. JenaValve Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Repeat transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) showed acceptable 30-day mortality in a high-risk population, with short-term outcomes superior to surgical explantation, but similar 1-year outcomes.
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to examine real-world experience with repeat transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in a population-based national database. BACKGROUND Repeat TAVR is a growing option in patients requiring reintervention for TAVR. However, large-scale studies with longitudinal follow-up are limited. METHODS All Medicare beneficiaries who underwent TAVR from 2012 to 2017 were included. Outcomes included 30 day and longitudinal mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as death, stroke, pacemaker insertion, major bleeding, acute kidney injury, or cardiac arrest. Outcomes of repeat TAVR were compared with surgical explantation after TAVR (TAVR explantation) in a matched analysis. RESULTS Of 133,250 patients who underwent TAVR, 617 (0.46%) underwent subsequent repeat TAVR at a median interval of 154 days (interquartile range: 58-537 days). Mortality at 30 days and 1 year was 6.0% and 22.0%, respectively. Rates of 30-day stroke and pacemaker insertion were 1.8% and 4.2%. Mortality at 30 days was lower in those who underwent their first TAVR during the later era (2015-2017) compared with earlier years (2012-2014) (4.6% vs 8.7%; P = 0.049). Repeat TAVR was associated with lower 30-day mortality compared with a matched group undergoing TAVR explantation (6.2% vs 12.3%; P = 0.05), although 1-year mortality was similar (21.0% vs 20.8%; P = 1.000). The incidence of 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events was higher with TAVR explantation compared with repeat TAVR (risk ratio: 2.92; 95% CI: 1.88-4.99; P # 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Repeat TAVR was performed with acceptable 30-day mortality in this high-risk population. Short-term outcomes were superior to surgical explantation, but 1-year outcomes were similar. Repeat TAVR will likely be an important option for aortic valve reintervention after TAVR. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2021;14:1717-26) (c) 2021 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据