4.3 Review

Antibody Response against SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Implications for Diagnosis, Treatment and Vaccine Development

期刊

INTERNATIONAL REVIEWS OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 393-413

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08830185.2021.1929205

关键词

Convalescent plasma; humoral response to COVID-19; neutralizing monoclonal antibodies; SARS-CoV-2; serologic tests; vaccine design

资金

  1. Istituto Superiore di Sanita

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes the main findings regarding the humoral immune response to COVID-19, focusing on levels and kinetics of antibodies in infected patients, as well as the specificity spectrum and neutralizing potential. Furthermore, it discusses the implications of these humoral response characteristics on serologic testing, convalescent plasma therapy, and neutralizing monoclonal antibody treatment, while also providing updates on specific neutralizing antibodies and suggestions for vaccine evaluation and development.
Many recent studies have reported the onset of a robust antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and highlighted produced antibodies' specific qualitative and quantitative aspects, relevant for developing antibody-based diagnostic and therapeutic options. In this review, firstly we will report main information acquired so far regarding the humoral response to COVID-19; we will concentrate, in particular, upon the observed levels and the kinetics, the specificity spectrum and the neutralizing potential of antibodies produced in infected patients. We will then discuss the implication of humoral response's characteristics in the development and correct use of serologic tests, as well as the efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma therapy and of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for treating infected patients and preventing new infections. An update of the list of newly isolated specific neutralizing antibodies and suggestions for vaccine evaluation and development will be also provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据