4.5 Article

Staged reconstruction of unilateral neglected hip dislocation through total hip arthroplasty and subsequent intramedullary femoral lengthening

期刊

INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS
卷 45, 期 12, 页码 3083-3090

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05099-x

关键词

Neglected hip dislocation; Developmental dysplasia of the hip; Total hip arthroplasty; Intramedullary lengthening; PRECICE (R) nail; Subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy

资金

  1. University Hospital of Muenster, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

THA combined with secondary femoral lengthening can successfully reconstruct the hip joint and equalize leg length, but careful monitoring of patients is required.
Background and purpose Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful approach to treat unilateral symptomatic neglected hip dislocation (NHD). However, the extensive leg length discrepancy (LLD) can hereby only be partially corrected. In case of residual LLD of more than 2 cm, subsequent femoral lengthening can be considered. Patients/material/methods Retrospective analysis of clinical data and radiographs of five patients (age 38.1 (28-51) years) with unilateral NHD who underwent THA with (n = 3) or without (n = 2) subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy (SSO) and secondary intramedullary femoral lengthening through a retrograde magnetically-driven lengthening nail (follow-up 18.4 (15-27) months). Results LLD was 51.0 (45-60) mm before and 37.0 (30-45) mm after THA. Delayed bone union at one SSO site healed after revision with autologous bone grafting and plate fixation. Subsequent lengthening led to leg length equalisation in all patients. Complete consolidation was documented in all lengthened segments. Conclusion Staged reconstruction via THA and secondary femoral lengthening can successfully be used to reconstruct the hip joint and equalise LLD. The specific anatomical conditions have to be taken into consideration when planning treatment, and patients ought to be closely monitored.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据