4.7 Article

The experimental thermal and hydraulic performance analyses for the location of perforations and dimples on the twisted tapes in twisted tape inserted tube

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2021.107033

关键词

Heat transfer enhancement; Friction factor; Performance evaluation criteria; Perforated twisted tape; Dimpled twisted tape

资金

  1. Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit, Erciyes University, Turkey [FYL-2020-10681]
  2. TUBITAK [219M049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental investigation on heat transfer enhancement using various twisted tape inserted tube configurations under turbulent flow conditions. Results show that DTTEs have better heat transfer performance compared to PTTEs, while PTTEs have less friction loss.
Experimental heat transfer enhancement investigation is carried out by using various twisted tape inserted tube configurations under turbulent flow conditions. Constant heat flux is applied on the outer wall of the test tube. The working fluid is selected as water. The twisted tapes having twist ratio (y/w) of 5.88 are modified with perforations (PTTE) and dimples (DTTE) at the edge of the twisted tape. The ratio of the distances between the perforations/dimples (p) to the twist length (y), i.e. pitch ratio (p/y), are selected as 0.25, 0.50 and 1.00. The results show that using twisted tapes lead to increase thermal performance when compared to the smooth tube. The DTTEs promise more heat transfer performance rather than the PTTEs, while the PTTEs gives less friction loss penalty than the DTTEs. Overall results are given as performance evaluation criteria and the highest PEC value is obtained as 1.57 for DTTE_p/y = 0.25 type twisted tape insert used case at Reynolds number of 6367. In addition, the paper includes a comparative evaluation in terms of the heat transfer and the hydraulic performance about the perforations/dimples at the edge or centre of the twisted tape.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据