4.5 Article

An approach to assessing the contribution of the high LET effect in strategies for Auger endoradiotherapy

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1976862

关键词

Auger emitters; high LET; DNA damage; DNA-binding radioprotectors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a possible approach to evaluate tumor-targeting Auger-labeled conjugates by assessing the impact of a radioprotector. The results of radioprotection experiments with 25 kVp X-rays show that the extent of radioprotection was comparable for all radiation conditions, although the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was higher for soft X-rays.
Purpose: The interest in exploiting Auger emitters in cancer therapy stems from their high linear energy transfer (LET)-type radiation damage to DNA. However, the design of Auger-emitter labeled vehicles that target the Auger cascade specifically to the DNA of tumour cells is challenging. Here we suggest a possible approach to evaluate tumour-targeting Auger-labeled conjugates by assessing the impact of a radioprotector known to be effective in protecting from low LET radiation, but not high LET radiation. Given some similarity between the energy spectrum of Auger electrons and that of secondary electrons from soft X-rays, we report the results of radioprotection experiments with 25 kVp X-rays. Materials and methods: Clonogenic survival curves for cultured human keratinocytes were established for three different irradiation conditions: Cs-137 gamma-rays, 25 kVp X-rays and 320 kVp X-rays, and the effect of including a new radioprotector, denoted 2PH, was investigated. Results: The extent of radioprotection by 2PH was comparable for all radiation conditions, although RBE was higher (about 1.7) for soft X-rays. Conclusions: Radioprotectors like 2PH will help to evaluate Auger endoradiotherapy strategies, by determining the relative contributions of the high-LET effects (not protected), compared to other components, such as Auger electrons not effectively targeted to DNA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据