4.7 Article

Assessing the sustainability of cloud computing service providers for Industry 4.0: a state-of-the-art analytical approach

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 12, 页码 4196-4213

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2021.1959666

关键词

Industry 4; 0; cloud service provider (CSP); cloud computing; data envelopment analysis (DEA); quasi-fixed inputs; integer data

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evaluating the performance of providers of Industry 4.0 technologies is a ongoing challenge, and existing methods have some shortcomings. In this study, we propose a comprehensive analytical method based on data envelopment analysis to assess the sustainability of cloud service providers for Industry 4.0.
While interests in Industry 4.0 technologies such as cloud computing and the Internet of Things (IoT) are growing, an ongoing challenge is to properly evaluate the performance of the providers of such technologies. Methods have been developed and applied to assess the efficiency of cloud service providers (CSPs) for Industry 4.0. However, most existing methods suffer from such shortcomings as subjective weights and computing complexity, rendering it difficult to succinctly differentiate the performance of CSPs in a competitive market. Besides, the literature has not taken into account many different types of data such as ratios, integers, and undesirable factors that can affect the performance of CSPs. Most importantly, most existing studies do not consider the sustainability of CSPs in evaluating their performance. To address the above issues, we present a comprehensive analytical method based on data envelopment analysis (DEA) to gauge the sustainability of CSPs for Industry 4.0. Validating the usefulness of our method using a real-life dataset, we provide not only a viable means with sound academic underpinning but also significant managerial insights for practitioners to assess the sustainability of CSPs for Industry 4.0.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据