4.5 Article

On the imperfection sensitivity and design of tori-spherical shells under external pressure

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2021.104321

关键词

Buckling; Robust design; Knockdown factor; Imperfection sensitivity; Tori-spherical shell

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews experimental results of tori-spherical shells under external pressure, presents detailed numerical elastic-plastic buckling analysis and various geometric imperfection approaches, leading to the development of new design factors that significantly improve critical load estimations.
Tori-spherical shells are often used as enclosures of pressure vessels in ocean and civil engineering. When subjected to external pressure, these thin-walled shells are prone to buckling. The corresponding critical buckling pressure heavily depends on deviations from the ideal shell shape, but also the yield strength as well as the knuckle radius. This article summarizes and analyzes all known experimental results for tori-spherical shells under external pressure. A detailed numerical elastic-plastic buckling analysis of a tori-spherical bulkhead is presented including details regarding non-linear material model, finite-element modeling and solver settings. In addition, a wide variety of empirical design and numerical geometric imperfection approaches for tori-spheres are presented, applied and validated. Among the geometric imperfection approaches are realistic measured geometric imperfections, dimple imperfections, flat patch imperfections and reduced stiffness methods. Large scale parametric imperfection amplitude analyzes are performed in order to determine which imperfection concept delivers in general the best fit to experimental results. New design factors for different tori-spherical shell geometry configurations are consequently developed and validated with experimental results. The new design factors lead to significantly improved critical load estimations in comparison to lower-bounds obtained empirically.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据