4.7 Article

Dislocation density based crystal plasticity model incorporating the effect of precipitates in IN718 under monotonic and cyclic deformation

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.102990

关键词

Cyclic softening; Dislocation-precipitate interaction; Intergranular backstress; Intragranular backstress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A crystal plasticity model based on dislocation density has been developed to analyze the cyclic softening induced by precipitates in IN718. The model effectively simulates the macroscopic mechanical response under different loading conditions, with predictions showing good agreement with experimental data. Sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the influence of grain size, reversible dislocations, and precipitate size.
A dislocation density based crystal plasticity model is developed to account for the precipitate induced cyclic softening in IN718. The new model treats the interaction between the precipitates and the dislocations using a probabilistic approach. It is also capable of capturing the reduction in the effective size of the precipitates due to reversible dislocations shearing through them. Further, the phenomenological model accounts for the heterogeneous accumulation of dislocations in the microstructure (i) as a function of distance to the nearest grain boundary and (ii) the interparticle spacing within a grain. The developed model is used to simulate the macroscopic mechanical response of IN718 under a series of monotonic and cyclic loads at different strain rates and alternating strain levels, respectively. Model predictions of macroscopic behavior are shown to be in good agreement with experimental data. They can capture the initial hardening and subsequent softening during cyclic loading for several strain amplitudes. Sensitivity analyses have been performed to understand the influence of grain size, reversible dislocations, and the size of the precipitates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据