4.7 Article

Chitosan alginate nanoparticles as a platform for the treatment of diabetic and non-diabetic pressure ulcers: Formulation and in vitro/in vivo evaluation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120963

关键词

Chitosan; Alginate; Nanoparticles; Diabetic pressure ulcers; Bedsores; Wound healing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chitosan and alginate nanoparticles were prepared for the treatment of diabetic and non-diabetic pressure ulcers, showing positive and negative charged CA NPs significantly enhanced wound closure rates.
Chitosan and alginate are natural bioactive polymers with wound healing properties, in addition to chitosan's anti-bacterial properties. In this study, these two polymers were combined in a drug-free nanosystem with positive or negative surface charges, for the treatment of non-diabetic and diabetic pressure ulcers. Chitosan alginate nanoparticles (CA NPs) were prepared by a modified ionic gelation method. Interaction between the polymers and formation of the NPs were confirmed by Fourier-Transform infrared spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry and transmission electron microscopy. For in vivo study, selected CA NPs with optimum particle size, polydispersity index, positive and negative zeta potential, were evaluated for their pressure ulcershealing effect using non-diabetic and diabetic rats. Rate of wound closure, histological examination and histomorphometric assessment were used to evaluate the CA NPs' wound healing potential. Positively and negatively charged CA NPs significantly enhanced wound closure rates, compared to control untreated group. Histological and histomorphometric analysis revealed higher quality and maturation of the formed granulation tissue, less inflammation and higher collagen content with positively charged CA NPs containing higher amount of chitosan. These results suggest that chitosan alginate nanoparticles offer a promising platform for diabetic and nondiabetic wound healing applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据