4.7 Article

Improving stability and oral bioavailability of hydroxycamptothecin via nanocrystals in microparticles (NCs/MPs) technology

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120729

关键词

Hydroxycamptothecin; Nanocrystals; Microparticles; Oral; Bioavailability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82003703]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a NCs/MPs technology to improve the dissolution and oral absorption of poorly soluble drugs. By encapsulating nanocrystals in microparticles, the technology successfully enhanced drug release in intestinal fluid and significantly improved oral bioavailability, offering a promising and effective approach for enhancing the solubility of poorly soluble drugs.
This study developed a nanocrystals-in-microparticles (NCs/MPs) technology for improving dissolution and oral absorption of poorly soluble drugs. Hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT) was selected as a model drug and prepared to be nanocrystals (HCPT-NCs) by acid-alkali based precipitation. The HCPT-NCs were rod like shape with the length of 250 nm and the width of 50 nm. Then, the chitosan and sodium alginate were selected as microparticles matrix to encapsulate the HCPT-NCs. The HCPT-NCs were entrapped in microparticles with a D-50 value of 15 mu m. The drug loading capacity of microparticles achieved more than 40% (w/w) by NCs/MPs technology. The powder X-ray diffraction showed the crystal structure of HCPT in microparticles was same as nanocrystals, indicating that the preparation of microparticles could not destroy the nanocrystals. The in vitro release demonstrated that microparticles could protect the NCs in gastric fluid and release NCs in intestinal fluid. Furthermore, the oral bioavailability of HCPT in NCs/MPs was improved by 18-fold compared to bulk HCPT and 2.1-fold compared to HCPT-NCs as tested by a rat model. Therefore, NCs/MPs technology is a promising and high effective approach to improve the oral bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据