4.7 Article

Microelectromechanical System Measurement of Platelet Contraction: Direct Interrogation of Myosin Light Chain Phosphorylation

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22126448

关键词

platelets; myosin light chain; phosphorylation; force of contraction; Western blot

资金

  1. NIH-T32 grant [GM008792-17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationship between platelet contraction force and MLC phosphorylation was investigated using a novel MEMS clot contraction sensor. The force of platelet contraction was found to be linearly related to levels of phosphorylated MLC.
Myosin Light Chain (MLC) regulates platelet contraction through its phosphorylation by Myosin Light Chain Kinase (MLCK) or dephosphorylation by Myosin Light Chain Phosphatase (MLCP). The correlation between platelet contraction force and levels of MLC phosphorylation is unknown. We investigate the relationship between platelet contraction force and MLC phosphorylation using a novel microelectromechanical (MEMS) based clot contraction sensor (CCS). The MLCK and MLCP pair were interrogated by inhibitors and activators of platelet function. The CCS was fabricated from silicon using photolithography techniques and force was validated over a range of deflection for different chip spring constants. The force of platelet contraction measured by the clot contraction sensor (CCS) was compared to the degree of MLC phosphorylation by Western Blotting (WB) and ELISA. Stimulators of MLC phosphorylation produced higher contraction force, higher phosphorylated MLC signal in ELISA and higher intensity bands in WB. Inhibitors of MLC phosphorylation produced the opposite. Contraction force is linearly related to levels of phosphorylated MLC. Direct measurements of clot contractile force are possible using a MEMS sensor platform and correlate linearly with the degree of MLC phosphorylation during coagulation. Measured force represents the mechanical output of the actin/myosin motor in platelets regulated by myosin light chain phosphorylation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据