4.7 Review

Molecular Physiology of Anaerobic Phototrophic Purple and Green Sulfur Bacteria

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22126398

关键词

molecular mechanisms of photosynthesis; anoxygenic bacteria; hydrogen sulfide; detoxification; anaerobes; water environment

资金

  1. Grant Agency of Masaryk University [MUNI/A/1425/2020]
  2. Hungarian Academy of Sciences [BO/00144/20/5]
  3. New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology from National Research, Development and Innovation Fund [UNKP-20-5-SZTE-330]
  4. Ministry of Human Capacities, Hungary [20391-3/2018/FEKUSTRAT]
  5. ESCMID's 30 under 30 Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the two main types of bacterial photosynthesis: oxygenic and anoxygenic, focusing on the molecular mechanisms and physiological processes of purple and green sulfur bacteria. It also explores the molecular biotechnological perspectives of these phototrophic microorganisms.
There are two main types of bacterial photosynthesis: oxygenic (cyanobacteria) and anoxygenic (sulfur and non-sulfur phototrophs). Molecular mechanisms of photosynthesis in the phototrophic microorganisms can differ and depend on their location and pigments in the cells. This paper describes bacteria capable of molecular oxidizing hydrogen sulfide, specifically the families Chromatiaceae and Chlorobiaceae, also known as purple and green sulfur bacteria in the process of anoxygenic photosynthesis. Further, it analyzes certain important physiological processes, especially those which are characteristic for these bacterial families. Primarily, the molecular metabolism of sulfur, which oxidizes hydrogen sulfide to elementary molecular sulfur, as well as photosynthetic processes taking place inside of cells are presented. Particular attention is paid to the description of the molecular structure of the photosynthetic apparatus in these two families of phototrophs. Moreover, some of their molecular biotechnological perspectives are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据