4.7 Article

A POLE Splice Site Deletion Detected in a Patient with Biclonal CLL and Prostate Cancer: A Case Report

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22179410

关键词

chronic lymphocytic leukemia; prostate cancer; case report; immunoglobulin light chain; POLE

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P32762-B]
  2. FWF program Immunity in Cancer and Allergy [FWF W1213]
  3. SCRI-LIMCR
  4. City of Salzburg
  5. Province of Salzburg
  6. FWF [P28201]
  7. WISS 2025 (Cancer Cluster Salzburg, CCSII-IOS)
  8. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P28201, P32762] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is associated with clonal hematopoiesis or germline predisposition, and in some cases, there may be bi- or oligoclonal CLL disease. Additionally, a rare germline polymorphism in the POLE gene detected in CLL patients may predispose them to cancer, particularly CLL.
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is considered a clonal B cell malignancy. Sporadically, CLL cases with multiple productive heavy and light-chain rearrangements were detected, thus leading to a bi- or oligoclonal CLL disease with leukemic cells originating either from different B cells or otherwise descending from secondary immunoglobulin rearrangement events. This suggests a potential role of clonal hematopoiesis or germline predisposition in these cases. During the screening of 75 CLL cases for kappa and lambda light-chain rearrangements, we could detect a single case with CLL cells expressing two distinct kappa and lambda light chains paired with two separate immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable regions. Furthermore, this patient also developed a prostate carcinoma. Targeted genome sequencing of highly purified light-chain specific CLL clones from this patient and from the prostate carcinoma revealed the presence of a rare germline polymorphism in the POLE gene. Hence, our data suggest that the detected SNP may predispose for cancer, particularly for CLL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据