4.7 Review

The Effect of Castration on Peripheral Autonomic Neurons Supplying Mammalian Male Genitourinary System

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22147632

关键词

male genitourinary system; testosterone deprivation; androgen receptor; castration; apoptosis; autonomic innervation

资金

  1. RID [010/RID/2018/19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review paper explores the influence of androgens on pelvic autonomic pathways in male mammals, highlighting significant differences between rats and pigs in terms of the effects of testosterone deprivation on pelvic neurons. The study also discusses the clinicopathological consequences of testosterone deprivation for the functioning of urogenital organs.
This review paper deals with the influence of androgens (testosterone) on pelvic autonomic pathways in male mammals. The vast majority of the relevant information has been gained in experiments involving castration (testosterone deprivation) performed in male rats, and recently, in male pigs. In both species, testosterone significantly affects the biology of the pathway components, including the pelvic neurons. However, there are great differences between rats and pigs in this respect. The most significant alteration is that testosterone deprivation accomplished a few days after birth results some months later in the excessive loss (approximately 90%) of pelvic and urinary bladder trigone intramural neurons in the male pig, while no changes in the number of pelvic neurons are observed in male rats (rats do not have the intramural ganglia). In the castrated pigs, much greater numbers of pelvic neurons than in the non-castrated animals express CGRP, GAL, VIP (peptides known to have neuroprotective properties), and caspase 3, suggesting that neurons die due to apoptosis triggered by androgen deprivation. In contrast, only some morpho-electrophysiological changes affecting neurons following castration are found in male rats. Certain clinicopathological consequences of testosterone deprivation for the functioning of urogenital organs are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据