3.9 Article

Immunolocalization of Leptin Receptor and mRNA Expression of Leptin and Estrogen Receptors as well as Caspases in the Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) of the Chicken Embryo

期刊

FOLIA BIOLOGICA-KRAKOW
卷 64, 期 2, 页码 79-87

出版社

POLISH ACAD SCIENCES, INST SYSTEMATICS EVOLUTION ANIMALS
DOI: 10.3409/fb64_2.79

关键词

leptin receptors; estrogen receptors; caspases; chorioallantoic membrane; chicken embryo

类别

资金

  1. [DS 3243/KFiEZ]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) is used as a model in tests of angiogenesis, the biocompatibility of materials as well as tumor invasive potential. To assess the properties of CAM tissue, the localization of leptin receptor in the CAM, and the mRNA expression of two leptin receptor isoforms, estrogen receptors (ER alpha and ER beta) and caspases (-1 and -3) in the CAM on embryonic days 12 (E12), 15 (E15) and 18 (E18) were investigated. The leptin receptor was immunolocalized in each structure of the CAM (chorionic epithelium, allantoic epithelium, mesodermal layer and the walls of blood vessels) and did not change among analyzed stages of embryonic development (E12, E15 and E18) and between sexes. Expression of mRNA of genes encoding leptin and estrogen receptors as well as caspases was detected in the CAM of female and male chicken embryos at all three analysed stages of development. The relative mRNA expression of the long form of leptin receptor exceeded that of its short isoform. The mRNA expression of ER alpha was significantly higher than ER beta as well as caspase-3 in comparison with caspase-1. There were no differences in mRNA expression of these genes between sexes and among analyzed developmental days. The results indicate that theCAMis a target tissue for leptin as well as for estrogens and thatCAM development is partially regulated by caspase-1 and caspase-3 dependent cell death. These results should be taken into consideration in studies in which the CAM is used as an experimental model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据