4.7 Article

Pathogenesis-Related Genes of PR1, PR2, PR4, and PR5 Families Are Involved in the Response to Fusarium Infection in Garlic (Allium sativum L.)

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22136688

关键词

garlic Allium sativum L; pathogenesis-related proteins; biotic stress; Fusarium spp; gene structure; gene expression

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [20-316-70009]
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified PR1, PR2, PR4, and PR5 genes in garlic that may play a role in defense against Fusarium infection, with their expression varying between cultivars resistant and susceptible to the pathogen. These findings could contribute to breeding programs aiming to enhance the resistance of Allium crops to Fusarium infections.
Plants of the genus Allium developed a diversity of defense mechanisms against pathogenic fungi of the genus Fusarium, including transcriptional activation of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes. However, the information on the regulation of PR factors in garlic (Allium sativum L.) is limited. In the present study, we identified AsPR genes putatively encoding PR1, PR2, PR4, and PR5 proteins in A. sativum cv. Ershuizao, which may be involved in the defense against Fusarium infection. The promoters of the AsPR1-5 genes contained jasmonic acid-, salicylic acid-, gibberellin-, abscisic acid-, auxin-, ethylene-, and stress-responsive elements associated with the response to plant parasites. The expression of AsPR1c, d, g, k, AsPR2b, AsPR5a, c (in roots), and AsPR4a(c), b, and AsPR2c (in stems and cloves) significantly differed between garlic cultivars resistant and susceptible to Fusarium rot, suggesting that it could define the PR protein-mediated protection against Fusarium infection in garlic. Our results provide insights into the role of PR factors in A. sativum and may be useful for breeding programs to increase the resistance of Allium crops to Fusarium infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据