4.7 Article

RABL6A Regulates Schwann Cell Senescence in an RB1-Dependent Manner

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22105367

关键词

RABL6A; retinoblastoma protein (RB1); Schwann cell; senescence; MPNST

资金

  1. Children's Tumor Foundation (CTF) Synodos for Neurofibromatosis-1 grant
  2. University of Iowa Sarcoma Multidisciplinary Oncology Group pilot award
  3. NCI Core Grant [P30 CA086862]
  4. CTF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Schwann cells' abnormal proliferation and transformation can lead to benign neurofibromas and deadly malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, with RABL6A potentially promoting this process by inhibiting RB1.
Schwann cells are normally quiescent, myelinating glia cells of the peripheral nervous system. Their aberrant proliferation and transformation underlie the development of benign tumors (neurofibromas) as well as deadly malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs). We discovered a new driver of MPNSTs, an oncogenic GTPase named RABL6A, that functions in part by inhibiting the RB1 tumor suppressor. RB1 is a key mediator of cellular senescence, a permanent withdrawal from the cell cycle that protects against cell immortalization and transformation. Based on the RABL6A-RB1 link in MPNSTs, we explored the hypothesis that RABL6A promotes Schwann cell proliferation and abrogates their senescence by inhibiting RB1. Using sequentially passaged normal human Schwann cells (NHSCs), we found that the induction of replicative senescence was associated with reduced expression of endogenous RABL6A. Silencing RABL6A in low passage NHSCs caused premature stress-induced senescence, which was largely rescued by co-depletion of RB1. Consistent with those findings, Rabl6-deficient MEFs displayed impaired proliferation and accelerated senescence compared to wildtype MEFs. These results demonstrate that RABL6A is required for maintenance of proper Schwann cell proliferation and imply that aberrantly high RABL6A expression may facilitate malignant transformation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据