4.7 Article

Challenging Safety and Efficacy of Retinal Gene Therapies by Retinogenesis

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22115767

关键词

gene therapy; adeno-associated virus (AAV); retinal degeneration; transcription; zinc finger; retinitis pigmentosa; rhodopsin; autosomal dominant

资金

  1. European Research Council [311682, 813223]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [311682, 813223] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthetic transcriptional repressor ZF6-DB designed for treating retinitis pigmentosa does not disrupt murine retinal development while effectively blocking target gene expression. Delivery of ZF6-DB during retinal development in mice results in morphological and functional recovery of the retina in a model of retinitis pigmentosa. The study suggests the use of developmental transitions as a safe approach for retinal gene therapies.
Gene-expression programs modulated by transcription factors (TFs) mediate key developmental events. Here, we show that the synthetic transcriptional repressor (TR; ZF6-DB), designed to treat Rhodopsin-mediated autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (RHO-adRP), does not perturb murine retinal development, while maintaining its ability to block Rho expression transcriptionally. To express ZF6-DB into the developing retina, we pursued two approaches, (i) the retinal delivery (somatic expression) of ZF6-DB by Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector (AAV-ZF6-DB) gene transfer during retinogenesis and (ii) the generation of a transgenic mouse (germ-line transmission, TR-ZF6-DB). Somatic and transgenic expression of ZF6-DB during retinogenesis does not affect retinal function of wild-type mice. The P347S mouse model of RHO-adRP, subretinally injected with AAV-ZF6-DB, or crossed with TR-ZF6-DB or shows retinal morphological and functional recovery. We propose the use of developmental transitions as an effective mode to challenge the safety of retinal gene therapies operating at genome, transcriptional, and transcript levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据