4.7 Review

GSK-3β, FYN, and DYRK1A: Master Regulators in Neurodegenerative Pathways

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22169098

关键词

protein kinases (PKs); central nervous system (CNS); blood-brain barrier (BBB); tauopathies; PKs modulation; crosstalk; multi-target

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein kinases are crucial in CNS diseases, but the failure of clinical trials and drug development processes have posed challenges in treating neurological disorders. Recent drug design strategies have shown progress in developing disease-modifying agents for CNS diseases.
Protein kinases (PKs) have been recognized as central nervous system (CNS)-disease-relevant targets due to their master regulatory role in different signal transduction cascades in the neuroscience space. Among them, GSK-3 beta, FYN, and DYRK1A play a crucial role in the neurodegeneration context, and the deregulation of all three PKs has been linked to different CNS disorders with unmet medical needs, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), and several neuromuscular disorders. The multifactorial nature of these diseases, along with the failure of many advanced CNS clinical trials, and the lengthy approval process of a novel CNS drug have strongly limited the CNS drug discovery. However, in the near-decade from 2010 to 2020, several computer-assisted drug design strategies have been combined with synthetic efforts to develop potent and selective GSK-3 beta, FYN, and DYRK1A inhibitors as disease-modifying agents. In this review, we described both structural and functional aspects of GSK-3 beta, FYN, and DYRK1A and their involvement and crosstalk in different CNS pathological signaling pathways. Moreover, we outlined attractive medicinal chemistry approaches including multi-target drug design strategies applied to overcome some limitations of known PKs inhibitors and discover improved modulators with suitable blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability and drug-like properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据