4.7 Article

Probing of Interactions of Magnetite Nanoparticles Coated with Native and Aminated Starch with a DPPC Model Membrane

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22115939

关键词

magnetite nanoparticles; starch; aminated starch; cell membrane; Langmuir film; nanomedicine

资金

  1. National Science Centre, Poland [2016/21/N/ST7/03035]
  2. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [0511/SBAD/2151]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the interactions between magnetite nanoparticles and phospholipids in cell membranes is crucial for safe medical applications. Surface coating of nanoparticles plays a key role, with aminated starch improving drug binding and reducing membrane disruption.
Understanding the mechanism of interactions between magnetite nanoparticles and phospholipids that form cellular membranes at the molecular level is of crucial importance for their safe and effective application in medicine (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging, targeted drug delivery, and hyperthermia-based anticancer therapy). In these interactions, their surface coating plays a crucial role because even a small modification to its structure can cause significant changes to the behaviour of the magnetite nanoparticles that come in contact with a biomembrane. In this work, the influence of the magnetite nanoparticles functionalized with native and aminated starch on the thermodynamics, morphology, and dilatational elasticity of the model cell membranes was studied. The model cell membranes constituted the Langmuir monolayers formed at the air-water interface of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC). The surface of the aminated starch-coated nanoparticles was enriched in highly reactive amino groups, which allowed more effective binding of drugs and biomolecules suitable for specific nano-bio applications. The studies indicated that the presence of these groups also reduced to some extent the disruptive effect of the magnetite nanoparticles on the model membranes and improved their adsorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据