4.7 Review

Breast Cancer and Anaesthesia: Genetic Influence

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22147653

关键词

anaesthetic drugs and techniques; opioids; propofol; volatile agent; breast cancer; cancer recurrence; biomarkers; miRNA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breast cancer is the leading cause of mortality in women, and the clinical and morphological heterogeneity of breast tumors has led to diversity in staging and classification systems. Surgical treatment is crucial for managing breast cancer patients, while the use of anesthetic and analgesic agents during surgery may impact the survival and progression of the disease.
Breast cancer is the leading cause of mortality in women. It is a heterogeneous disease with a high degree of inter-subject variability even in patients with the same type of tumor, with individualized medicine having acquired significant relevance in this field. The clinical and morphological heterogeneity of the different types of breast tumors has led to a diversity of staging and classification systems. Thus, these tumors show wide variability in genetic expression and prognostic biomarkers. Surgical treatment is essential in the management of these patients. However, the perioperative period has been found to significantly influence survival and cancer recurrence. There is growing interest in the pro-tumoral effect of different anaesthetic and analgesic agents used intraoperatively and their relationship with metastatic progression. There is cumulative evidence of the influence of anaesthetic techniques on the physiopathological mechanisms of survival and growth of the residual neoplastic cells released during surgery. Prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to obtain quality evidence on the relationship between cancer and anaesthesia. This document summarizes the evidence currently available about the effects of the anaesthetic agents and techniques used in primary cancer surgery and long-term oncologic outcomes, and the biomolecular mechanisms involved in their interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据