4.7 Review

Metabolomic Biomarkers in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Review of the Evidence

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22115512

关键词

gestational diabetes mellitus; metabolomics; biomarkers; metabolites; mass spectrometry; lipidomics

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia
  2. Clinical Academic Fellowship from Monash Health
  3. NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the fastest growing type of diabetes worldwide, with metabolomic studies highlighting deranged amino acids, carbohydrates, and lipids metabolism pathways in GDM, suggesting potential biomarkers for diagnosis and future integration into clinical practice.
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the fastest growing type of diabetes, affecting between 2 to 38% of pregnancies worldwide, varying considerably depending on diagnostic criteria used and sample population studied. Adverse obstetric outcomes include an increased risk of macrosomia, and higher rates of stillbirth, instrumental delivery, and birth trauma. Metabolomics, which is a platform used to analyse and characterise a large number of metabolites, is increasingly used to explore the pathophysiology of cardiometabolic conditions such as GDM. This review aims to summarise metabolomics studies in GDM (from inception to January 2021) in order to highlight prospective biomarkers for diagnosis, and to better understand the dysfunctional metabolic pathways underlying the condition. We found that the most commonly deranged pathways in GDM include amino acids (glutathione, alanine, valine, and serine), carbohydrates (2-hydroxybutyrate and 1,5-anhydroglucitol), and lipids (phosphatidylcholines and lysophosphatidylcholines). We also highlight the possibility of using certain metabolites as predictive markers for developing GDM, with the use of highly stratified modelling techniques. Limitations for metabolomic research are evaluated, and future directions for the field are suggested to aid in the integration of these findings into clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据