4.5 Article

Perceived COVID-19-associated discrimination, mental health and professional-turnover intention among frontline clinical nurses: The mediating role of resilience

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 1674-1683

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/inm.12920

关键词

COVID-19; discrimination; mental health; nursing; resilience; turnover intention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Frontline nurses perceived a moderate level of COVID-19-associated discrimination, with higher discrimination levels being associated with poorer mental health and higher professional-turnover intention. Resilience acted as a mediator in reducing the effects of discrimination on nurses' mental health and their professional-turnover intention.
COVID-19-associated discrimination (CAD) is an important issue that may adversely affect frontline nurses' work effectiveness and well-being. This study examined the relationships between frontline nurses' perceptions of COVID-19-associated discrimination and their resilience, mental health, and professional-turnover intention. This cross-sectional descriptive study involved 259 frontline nurses in the Central Philippines and used four online self-report measures. The results revealed that frontline nurses perceived a moderate level of COVID-19-associated discrimination. Frontline nurses who perceived a higher level of discrimination during the coronavirus pandemic reported poorer mental health and higher professional-turnover intention. Resilience acted as a mediator and reduced the effects of COVID-19-associated discrimination on nurses' mental health and their professional-turnover intention. Proactive measures to reduce the negative consequences of discrimination during the pandemic, and efforts to foster resilience in nurses who are in the forefront of the fight against the highly transmissible virus, should be given high priority by hospital and nursing administrators to better support nurses' mental health and foster retention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据