4.7 Article

Multiplicative consistency analysis of linguistic preference relation with self-confidence level and self-doubting level and its application in a group decision making

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
卷 36, 期 10, 页码 5389-5418

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/int.22516

关键词

experts' behavior; group decision making; linguistic preference relation; multiplicative consistent

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a group decision-making approach based on the multiplicative consistency of linguistic preference relation with experts' self-confidence and self-doubting levels. It proposes a consensus-building iterative process to achieve multiplicative consistency and studies social network analysis for experts' weight determination. The system is demonstrated with a case study and comparative analyses.
This article focuses on a group decision-making (GDM) approach based on the multiplicative consistency of linguistic preference relation (LPR) with experts' self-confidence and self-doubting (SC&SD) levels. To give their preferences, the experts use their knowledge of the experience according to their degree of SC&SD levels. First, we propose the concepts of multiplicative consistent LPR-SC&SD using the experts' general minimum self-confidence level and the maximum self-doubting level. We suggest then a consensus-building iterative process, that is, a consensus reaching process (CRP) algorithm to achieve multiplicative consistency of LPR-SC&SD according to identification and adjustment rules. A theorem is given for convergence of the CRP algorithm. In a GDM problem, social network analysis is studied for the experts to obtain their weight according to the degree of SC&SD. When we achieve the acceptable preferences of all the experts using the CRP algorithm of the multiplicative consistent LPR-SC&SD, then we aggregate all the preferences by the experts' weights. The aggregation of all preferences is also an LPR-SC&SD, known as the weight collective LPR-SC&SD. Finally, a case-by-case example and several comparative analyses are done with the current GDM processes to demonstrate the viability and applicability of the proposed GDM system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据