4.7 Article

Peripheral Blood Monocyte to Lymphocyte Ratio for Prediction of Tuberculous Pleuritis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 212-216

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.033

关键词

Monocytes; Lymphocytes; Tuberculosis; Pleural effusion; Pleural tuberculosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The peripheral monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (ML ratio) is a useful tool for diagnosing and predicting treatment response in patients with tuberculous pleuritis, showing potential as an adjunctive diagnostic and monitoring tool.
Objective: To examine the peripheral monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (ML ratio) of patients with tuberculous (TB) pleuritis and the ML ratio changes after treatment. Methods: Clinical and laboratory information were collected from patients with lymphocytic exudative pleural effusion admitted to Chiang Mai University Hospital from 2013 to 2019. This study compared the ML ratios between tuberculous pleuritis and other diagnoses in patients who were followed after treatment. Results: A total of 152 patients were included: 57 with tuberculous pleuritis and 95 with other lymphocytic exudates. The majority of non-tuberculous effusion was malignant pleural effusion. The mean ML ratio of each group was 0.72 +/- 0.29 and 0.34 +/- 0.13 (p < 0.001). The Area Under the Receiver Operative Characteristic Curve of the ML ratio for diagnosing tuberculous pleuritis was 0.91. The best cut-off point of the ML ratio for diagnosing tuberculous pleuritis was > 0.45, where the sensitivity and specificity were 82.5% and 86.3%, respectively. The ML ratio gradually reduced after the anti-TB treatment. ML ratios at 0, 2, and 6 months after the treatment were 0.72 +/- 0.29, 0.40 +/- 0.37, and 0.30 +/- 0.27, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The peripheral blood ML ratio is an easy and useful tool for diagnosing and predicting the treatment response in patients with tuberculous pleuritis. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据