4.7 Article

Urea-assisted synthesis towards a renewable rice husk silica-derived Ni-phyllosilicate catalyst for CO2 methanation

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 54, 页码 27567-27575

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.035

关键词

Biogenic silica; Rice husk; Ni-phyllosilicate; Urea; Hydrothermal reaction; CO2 methanation

资金

  1. Science and Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Project for College Students [S202010424026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nickel phyllosilicate was prepared through hydrothermal reaction, with urea facilitating its formation and improving both catalytic activity and long-term stability. The addition of urea resulted in dense flower-like nanosheets with high nickel content, demonstrating the potential for enhanced performance in CO2 methanation.
In this work, nickel phyllosilicate was prepared through the hydrothermal reaction of rice husk-derived silica (SR) and nickel nitrate. Owing to the loss of surface silanol group on SR during the calcination process, a small amount of Ni-phyllosilicate with Ni content of 10.2 wt% was obtained on N-220/SR, which was prepared under a very severe hydrothermal condition of 220 degrees C for 48 h. After the addition of urea, the dense flower-like nanosheets attributing to Ni-phyllosilicate were observed on the surface of N-180/SR-U-24 with high Ni content of 22.6 wt%, which was prepared under a much milder hydrothermal temperature of 180 degrees C and a shorter reaction time of 24 h. This was because urea could facilitate the formation of an important intermediate (Ni(OH)(2)) and leaching of SiO2, resulting in the quick formation of Ni-phyllosilicate. N-180/SR-U-24 exhibited both good catalytic activity and high long-term stability for CO2 methanation due to the relatively high Ni content, fine Ni particles and the strong metal-support interaction derived from Ni-phyllosilicate. (C) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据