4.7 Article

Long-term evolution of mechanical performance of solid oxide fuel cell stack and the underlying mechanism

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 47, 页码 24293-24304

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.196

关键词

Solid oxide fuel cell; Thermal stress; Failure probability; Creep strain; Thermal-mechanical evolution

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11774324, 12074362]
  2. Super-computing Center of University of Science and Technology of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals the importance of temperature uniformity in long-term operation of solid oxide fuel cells, which can significantly decrease stresses and strains, as well as failure probabilities of all stack components. The reliability of the sealant is increased and all components are predictably safe against strain failure for 100,000 hours.
Mechanical performance analysis is important for ensuring the long-term reliability of solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs). Thermal-mechanical models are constructed to conduct time-dependent mechanical performance analysis of SOFC stack with temperature field obtained by multiphysics modeling. The volume-averaged temperature field is used as comparison. The creep strains are examined with a time step of 10 h for 10,000 h. It reveals: (1) Uniform temperature significantly decreases the stresses, strains, failure probabilities of all stack components. (2) The failure probability of sealant reduced rapidly and the sealant becomes mechanically safer for long-term operation. (3) Creep strain is dominant for anode/sealant/interconnect, but negligible for electrolyte/cathode. All components are predictably safe against strain failure for 100,000 h (4) Creep strains of stack components interact with each other. Coupled analysis of creep strains of anode/sealant/interconnect is mandatory, but the creep strains of electrolyte/cathode may be neglected for studying mechanical evolutions. (c) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据