4.7 Article

Nickel-copper oxide nanoflowers for highly efficient glucose electrooxidation

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 56, 页码 28527-28536

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.089

关键词

NiCuO alloy; Glucose oxidation; Electrocatalysis; Electrodeposition; Nanoflower

资金

  1. Liaoning Province-Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science Joint Research and Development Fund [2019010274-JH3/301]
  2. Liaoning BaiQianWan Talents Program [[2019]45]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [2021JH6/10500143]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new NiCuO flower-like nanostructure catalyst prepared by a fast and low-cost electrodeposition method shows significant efficiency for glucose electrooxidation and outstanding stability, making it a promising functional material for the construction of glucose fuel cells and other electrochemical devices.
The development of highly active and low-cost electrocatalysts with excellent durability is a major challenge for glucose catalysis. Here, we report a fast and low-cost electrodeposition method for preparing a new NiCuO flower-like nanostructure with non-noble metals. The new NiCuO catalyst shows significant efficiency for glucose electrooxidation, which reaches an oxidative peak mass activity of 376.80 A g(-1) and retains 66% of the original current over 10,000 s in a stability test by chronoamperometry. We credit the excellent glucose oxidation activity and outstanding stability to the combination of non-noble metal materials and the flower-like nanostructures of the NiCuO/ITO electrode, which results in large electrochemically active surface areas (ECSAs) of 85.9 m(2) g(-1) and fast charge transfer as measured by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). This new NiCuO nano flower catalyst provides a new functional material for the building of glucose fuel cells and other electrochemical devices. (C) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据