4.7 Article

Effects of nitrogen addition on vented hydrogen-air deflagration in a vertical duct

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 50, 页码 25763-25770

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.077

关键词

Hydrogen explosion; Vented deflagration; Explosion suppression; Overpressure; Flame

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51874100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The experiments in this paper investigated the coupling effects of venting and nitrogen addition ratio on flame behavior and pressure evolution during hydrogen-air deflagration in a vertical duct. It was found that the nitrogen addition ratio significantly influenced the pressure-time histories in the duct, and for a certain ratio, the maximum overpressure increased with distance to the vent. Additionally, differences in overpressure between measuring points decreased with an increase in the nitrogen addition ratio.
In this paper, experiments were performed to investigate the coupling effects of venting and nitrogen addition ratio (x) on flame behavior and pressure evolution during hydrogen -air deflagration within and outside a 1-m-high vertical duct with a vent on its top. Experimental results reveal that x has significant effects on the pressure-time histories in the duct. Helmholtz oscillations of the internal overpressure were observed in all tests, and acoustic type oscillations appears in the tests only for x 1/4 25% and 30%. For a certain x, the maximum overpressure (Pmax) increased with the distance to the vent, i.e., the highest overall explosion overpressure was attained near the duct bottom; however, the difference in Pmax between various measuring points decreases with an increase in x. In all tests, a pressure peak in the duct was observed shortly after external explosion. The maximum internal and external overpressure decreased as x was increased. (c) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据