4.5 Review

Can pelvic floor muscle training prevent perineal laceration? A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13826

关键词

lacerations; natural childbirth; pelvic floor; perineum

资金

  1. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)
  2. FUNCAP (Fundacao Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that pelvic floor muscle training did not effectively prevent perineal laceration during vaginal delivery. Further research is needed to investigate different protocols and interventions.
Background Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is reportedly able to reduce risk factors for perineal trauma. However, the effects of these exercises on perineal injuries are unclear. Objective To investigate the effectiveness of PFMT in the prevention of perineal laceration. Search strategy Searches were conducted in PubMed/Medline, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL. For search strategies, we combined the terms PFMT, tear, laceration, perineum, and delivery. Selection criteria We included randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of PFMT for the prevention of perineal laceration during vaginal delivery. There were no period or language limitations. Data collection and analysis We conducted data extraction and synthesis. We performed a quality appraisal, a qualitative synthesis, and for meta-analysis we used the Software R. Main results Nine studies were included. In most studies, PFMT was performed daily, with a wide range of the number of contractions and sustainability. Prevalence of perineal laceration had a wide range and information on laceration degree was limited. Meta-analysis showed that PFMT was not effective to prevent perineal laceration. Conclusion Pelvic floor muscle training does not prevent perineal laceration. Further studies are needed to investigate different protocols and interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据