4.5 Article

Assistive Robot Design for Lower Limbs Rehabilitation Using Fuzzy Control

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 2384-2395

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40815-021-01152-4

关键词

Robot; Limbs rehabilitation; Fuzzy control; Sum-of-squares; Robust; H-infinity criterion; Lyapunov function

资金

  1. Ministry of Economic Affair [1Z1080763]
  2. Ministry of Health and Welfare [MOHW107-TDU-B-212-123006, MOHW108-TDU-B-212-133006]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 105-2314B-037-012, 109-2314-B-037-050]
  4. Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital [KMUH105-5R66, KMUH107-7R83]
  5. Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital [kmtth-103-011]
  6. Regenerative Medicine and Cell Therapy Research Center in Kaohsiung Medical University [KMU-TC108A02-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposed an assistive robot design for lower limbs rehabilitation using fuzzy control, with the aim to rejuvenate stroke patients' nervous system of motor function. The robot motion is driven from the patient's sole, and a discrete-time fuzzy control methodology has been applied to design a stable controller for the system. Preliminary experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the assistive robot in rehabilitating stroke patients.
This paper proposed an assistive robot design for lower limbs rehabilitation using fuzzy control. A robot is developed to rejuvenate stroke patients' nervous system of motor function by exercising their lower limb appropriately, to slow down motor function degradation, rebuild or strengthen the patient's motor function. Thus, the motion of robot must be driven from the sole of the patient and the shank of the patient must remain horizontal when knee joint is flexed. To achieve this target, discrete-time fuzzy control methodology has been used to design a controller for the stability of the robot system. Finally, the preliminary experimental results show the effectiveness of rehabilitation of the stroke patients using this assistive robot.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据