4.5 Article

Pork liver protein hydrolysates as extenders of pork patties shelf-life

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.15359

关键词

Antioxidant properties; lipid oxidation; natural extract; pork burger; sensory acceptance; volatile compounds

资金

  1. INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria, Spain) [RTA 2017-00024-CO4-04]
  2. INIA [CPD2016-0030]
  3. CYTED [119RT0568]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study added bioactive peptides from flavourzyme, bromelain, and alcalase activity to pork patties to improve their shelf-life. Results showed that hydrolysates obtained from bromelain enzyme exhibited the best antioxidative activity, suggesting their potential as natural antioxidants to prolong the shelf-life of pork burgers.
The growing demand for the consumption of more natural products challenges the food industry to meet consumer expectations. In this regard, bioactive peptides obtained from flavourzyme, bromelain and alcalase activity were added to pork patties with the aim of improving their shelf-life. Five treatments were prepared: control (CON, without enzymatic extract), positive control (ASA, with 150 mg kg(-1) of ascorbic acid) and three batches with 250 mg kg(-1) of different porcine liver hydrolysates [flavourzyme (FLA), bromelain (BRO) and alcalase (ALC)]. The analysis of raw burgers included proximate composition (moisture, protein, fat and ash contents), colour parameters (L*, a*, b*), metmyoglobin, lipid oxidation, volatile compounds profile and sensory evaluation. Hydrolysate obtained from bromelain enzyme showed the best a* parameter (5.15), the least lipid oxidation (0.63 mg MDA kg(-1)) and the lowest percentage of metmyoglobin (56.02%). Furthermore, this batch also presented the lowest content of aldehydes and alcohols resulting from lipid oxidation. Our results suggested that the hydrolysates obtained from bromelain activity possessed a good antioxidative activity, and therefore, they could be used as a natural antioxidant to extend the shelf-life of pork burgers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据