4.5 Article

Identification of haloarchaea during fermentation of Sardinella longiceps for being the starter culture to accelerate fish sauce production

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.15183

关键词

Fermentation; fish sauce; Halobacterium sp; Sardinella longiceps

资金

  1. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [RG-1437-005]
  2. SERB-DST [TAR/2019/000143]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to enhance the value of native species Sardinella longiceps through fermentation, observing a diverse range of halophilic archaea and their biochemical changes. A dominant Halobacterium species was identified during fish sauce fermentation, significantly reducing maturation time and improving enzyme activities. Sensory evaluation showed higher acceptability for archaeal fermented samples, suggesting potential for successful commercial implementation and global support for fishery product development.
The present study was aimed to improve the value of native species Sardinella longiceps by fermentation method. Throughout the fermentation process, Halophilic archaeal diversity (10(3)-10(7 )log CFU/g) with their biochemical changes was observed. Overall, 67 archaeal isolates were isolated in various stages of fermentation and its belonging to sixteen genera dominated by Halobacterium (16), Natronobacterium (9), Halococcus (8), Halomicrobium (5), Halorubrum (4) and Haloalkalicoccus (4) which were identified by 16S rRNAgene analysis. During the fish sauce fermentation, Halobacterium sp. S12FS1 was predominant and it has significantly reduced (75%) the maturation time from 12 months into 4 months with an effective biochemical changes and potential protease and lipase enzyme activities. The sensory evaluation of archaeal fermented samples has received higher level (9.1 +/- 0.48) of acceptability than control (7.4 +/- 0.43). Hence, the implementation of present work will be successful at commercial level and will support directly to fishery products development globally.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据